The past few weeks we have been focusing on the Debate Unit
in Public Speaking class. Over these weeks, we did many debates and discussed
over which techniques are more effective and useful in debates. Personally, I
have always been interested in debates, I enjoy discussing a topic with peers
and reaching a conclusion to see which point of view is the correct one. Throughout
my freshman year, I had various debates in my English class and I also
participated in 2 Model United Nations, so it is safe to say that I has already
had some practice and context in debates. However, this class really helped me
improve my skill because of the way how we were required to implement logo,
pathos and ethos into our arguments, rather than just say whatever comes to
mind. In the two main debates that we had in class, I was on the winning team,
however the margin of which the team won by differed. The first debate was a
much closer decision, as everyone in the class was still wrapping their heads
around the debate and the topic. Although in the second debate my team had a
much more organized and planned course of action, which I think is what allowed
us to come out winning in the end. In the first debate, I did not include much
logos or pathos, so my arguments were somewhat weaker and were easy to rebuttal,
however in the second debate, I focused much more on the strength and
credibility of my arguments in order to strongly get the team’s point across.
The final day on the topic was spent doing mini debates, where we would pick a
topic and discuss it 1 on 1 without any proper research. This activity was very
fun and helpful as it taught me to be quick on my feet while arguing, and how
you don’t really need to know everything about the topic you are discussing in
order to come out on top.
No comments:
Post a Comment